Banking does play an important role in people’s lives. It can be felt that the activities undertaken community are actually in touch with the bank. Especially when the people who have unfreeze credit at a bank either government banks and private banks, and one day he was in default so that the banks credit sentenced the entrance to the category of bad credit no way to resolve it is through the courts.
Public ignorance about the bank as a whole is more due to lack of information and knowledge provided by the different parties to the various levels of society, both living in the city and in rural areas. Even in the era of information developed so fast these days that should be public knowledge about the bank grows.
When is facing proceedings in respect of banking or specialized field, it would be nice if you use the services of lawyers who are competent in the field of case special and better yet, and presenting the expert witness testimony, for instance in the above example if the problems in the banking sector, the expert witness that we use is the expert banking sector. Point for obvious seated problems and seek solutions as the best way out so that the case can be resolved quickly and precisely.
Expert witnesses, understanding is what people think of an event based on knowledge and experience, and the opinion submitted under oath justice. Expert witnesses can be presented on request of both parties, a party, or because of his position. The main purpose of the expert witness is to convince the judge in deciding a case in a certain field, where an explanation of the case at hand can only be explained by experts, for example the case of banking, ballistic experts, computer experts, and others.
Witnesses and expert witnesses as evidence in proving the important thing at this stage of the trial. The judge examined witnesses and expert testimony during the trial. The testimony and evidence in the trial of members of the inspection is a guideline for judges in making its decision. However Evidence of a witness or expert evidence alone is not enough to convince the judge to decide the case. Because it could be evidence of a witness that one with the other witnesses or expert evidence with expert testimony that a different view of each other.